Produktivitas dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Sawah Tadah Hujan Di Kelurahan Cempaka Kota Banjarbaru

Productivity and Income of Rainfed Rice Farming In Cempaka Village, Banjarbaru City

  • Yan Yozef Agus Suratman Universitas Ahmad Yani Banjarmasin
Keywords: Productivity, income, farming, lowland rice

Abstract

       Optimization of rice productivity in paddy fields is one of the opportunities to increase national rice production. The not optimal productivity of rice in paddy fields, among others, is caused by various things, especially ethanol rice farming, which faces technical, social, and economic obstacles to develop a more profitable rice commodity. Fertilization management practices greatly affect productivity, if productivity is increased, resulting in higher income and enabling farmers to save and accumulate capital. The income earned by a farmer is the reward that the farming family receives from the use of production factors, labor, and capital invested in the business sector. This study aims to determine (i) the productivity of rainfed lowland rice farming, (ii) explicit costs, revenues, and income of rainfed lowland rice farming in Cempaka Village, Cempaka District, Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan Province. The research was conducted from March-May 2020. The method used in this study was a survey method with observational techniques, where the sampling technique was carried out by simple random sampling of 217 households taken 14% so that 30 respondents were obtained. The results showed that the productivity of rainfed lowland rice farming was 1,265.00 kg/respondent or 3.5 tons/ha. The average explicit cost is Rp. 1.751.506,83 / respondent or Rp. 4.865.296.74 / ha, the average revenue of Rp. 6.325.000 / respondent or Rp. 17.569.444,44 / ha and an average income of Rp. 4.573.493,17 / respondent or Rp. 12.704.147,71 / ha.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BIP. (2001). Dasar-Dasar Penyuluhan Pertanian dan Aplikasinya. (Issue 2001).

Erlina, Y., Elbaar, E.F., & Wardie, J. (2020). Analisis Faktor Sosial Ekonomi Pengembangan Padi Lokal Spesifik Lokasi Di Kabupaten Kapuas Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. 5(April), 61–68. http://snllb.ulm.ac.id /prosiding/index.php/snllb-lit/article/ view/322.

Fadholi, H. (1993). Ilmu Usaha Tani (3rd ed.). Penebar Swadaya.

Jamaluddin. (2015). Analisis Usahatani Padi Varietas Unggul Nasional Unggul Lokal dan Hibrida pada Sawah Tadah Hujan di Kecamatan Bangkinang Kabupaten Kampar. Jurnal Agribisnis, 17(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jsep.v11i1.5315.

Nazir, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian (10th ed.). Ghalia Indonesia.

Pratiwi, C. A., Gunawan, D. S., & Istiqomah, I. (2018). Analisis Ekonomi Usahatani Padi dan Kelayakan Rumah Tangga Tani di Desa Sambeng Kulon Kecamatan Kembaran Kabupaten Banyumas. JSEP (Journal of Social and Agricultural Economics), 11(1), 33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/jsep.v11i1.5315.

Suratman, Y. Y. A. (2017). Analisis Pendapatan Usahatani Cabai Besar ( Capsicum annum L.) di Desa Banua Kupang Kecamatan Labuan Amas Utara Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Tengah. Media Sains, 10(April), 72–81.

Triatmoko, E., & Fitriadi, S. (2020). Produktivitas dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Lokal Varitas Mayang di Desa Malintang Lama Kabupaten Banjar. Ziraa’ah Majalah Ilmiah Pertanian, 45(3), 254–262. https://doi. org/ttp://dx.doi.org/10.31602/zmip.v45i3.3035.

Umaroh, R., & Noor, T. I. (2019). Analisis Efisiensi Ekonomi Relatif Usahatani Padi Sawah Berdasarkan Luas Lahan Sawah Di Desa Sindangsari, Kecamatan Banjarsari, Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25157/jimag.v6i1.1233.

Wibowo, A. D. (2016). Dinamika Ketersediaan Beras : Sebuah Studi Kasus di Kalimantan Selatan. Ziraa’ah Majalah Ilmiah Pertanian, 41(2), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.31602/zmip.v41i2.427.

CROSSMARK
Published
2020-12-29
DIMENSIONS
How to Cite
Suratman, Y. Y. A. (2020). Produktivitas dan Pendapatan Usahatani Padi Sawah Tadah Hujan Di Kelurahan Cempaka Kota Banjarbaru. Rawa Sains: Jurnal Sains STIPER Amuntai, 10(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.36589/rs.v10i2.136